College Football: Cornhuskers Kick Off Big 10 Play At Home Against Illinois

Illinois at Nebraska -20, Total=66.5

What do the models say: CPA, Nebraska -21.4; Massey, Nebraska -16; Keepers, Nebraska -29; Massey Consensus, Nebraska -22.3; Kerns, Nebraska -26.5

Undefeated Nebraska, fresh of a hard-fought game last week against Miami, will hope to get a breather with its opening Big 10 game against Illinois on Saturday. The Huskers ran the ball for 343 yards in last week’s 41-31 victory, including 229 yards by Ameer Abdullah’s 229 rushing yards on just 35 carries.

Illinois escaped last week with a 42-35 win over Texas State. Quarterback Wes Lunt, an Oklahoma St. transfer, will sling the ball around. He has completed 66% of his passes and is averaging 309 yards per game, good for 14th in the country.

Illinois is 3-1 straight up and 1-3-0 against the line so far this year. They are averaging 32.7 points per game, and giving up 32.5 points per game on the defensive side of the ball. On offense, Illinois is averaging 108.2 rushing yards per game on 28 attempts, 3.9 yards per carry average. They are throwing the ball 40 times per game for a total of 322 yards, averaging 6 yards per passing attempt. Overall, Illinois has gained 430 total yards per game on an average of 67 plays. On defense, Illinois is allowing 430 yards per game on 84 plays for a 5 yards per play average. They have given up 13 yards per point so far this year. Illinois’s opponents have run the ball 59% of the time, and are averaging 4 yards per rushing attempt. The team has allowed completions on 61.3% of its opponents’ passing attempts, good for 257 passing yards per game (8 yards per passing attempt).

Nebraska is averaging 46 points per game so far in 2014, while allowing 20 points a game to its opponents. They have a 3-1-0 record against the spread, with a 4-0 straight up record. Defensively, Nebraska’s opponents are averaging 116 rushing yards per game on 32 attempts, a 3.7 yards per carry average. They are throwing the ball 39 times per game for a total of 214 yards, averaging 5 yards per passing attempt. Overall, Nebraska’s opponents have gained 330 total yards per game on an average of 71 plays. On offense, Nebraska is averaging 560 yards per game on 72 plays, for a 8 yards per play average. They are averaging 12 yards per point so far this year. Nebraska runs the ball 64% of the time, and are averaging 7.1 yards per rushing attempt. The team has completed 54.4% of its passing attempts, good for 230.7 passing yards per game (9 yards per passing attempt).

College Football: Tennessee Travels to Georgia as 16.5 Point Underdogs

Tennessee at Georgia -16.5, Total=56

What do the models say: CPA, Tennessee 16.8; Massey, Tennessee 14; Massey, Tennessee 28.2; Massey Consensus, Tennessee 10.8; Kerns, Tennessee 22.2

Tennessee opens up its SEC play with a doozy; on the road against #12 Georgia. Georgia still has hopes to make the SEC title game despite a loss to South Carolina, but they can’t afford to stumble in these gimme games. The Bulldogs are favored by 16.5. Georgia is coming off a 66-0 drubbing of Troy last Saturday, and were able to sit its starters in preparation for the Tennessee game. Star running back Todd Gurley was pulled after gaining 73 yards on just six carries.

Tennessee is 2-1 straight up and 1-2-0 against the line so far this year. They are averaging 27.3 points per game, and giving up 20 points per game on the defensive side of the ball. On offense, Tennessee is averaging 130 rushing yards per game on 39 attempts, 3.3 yards per carry average. They are throwing the ball 41 times per game for a total of 240 yards, averaging 5 yards per passing attempt. Overall, Tennessee has gained 370 total yards per game on an average of 80 plays. On defense, Tennessee is allowing 343 yards per game on 68 plays for a 5 yards per play average. They have given up 17 yards per point so far this year. Tennessee’s opponents have run the ball 49% of the time, and are averaging 4 yards per rushing attempt. The team has allowed completions on 57.7% of its opponents’ passing attempts, good for 214 passing yards per game (6 yards per passing attempt).

Georgia is averaging 49 points per game so far in 2014, while allowing 20 points a game to its opponents. They have a 2-1-0 record against the spread, with a 2-1 straight up record. Defensively, Georgia’s opponents are averaging 108.3 rushing yards per game on 38 attempts, a 2.9 yards per carry average. They are throwing the ball 32 times per game for a total of 210 yards, averaging 5 yards per passing attempt. Overall, Georgia’s opponents have gained 318 total yards per game on an average of 70 plays. On offense, Georgia is averaging 471 yards per game on 63 plays, for a 8 yards per play average. They are averaging 10 yards per point so far this year. Georgia runs the ball 63% of the time, and are averaging 7.7 yards per rushing attempt. The team has completed 68.6% of its passing attempts, good for 167.3 passing yards per game (7.2 yards per passing attempt).

Captain Paul McGinley Discusses Europe’s Early Ryder Cup Lead

Europe is now a -330 favorite to after jumping to a 5-3 lead over the Unites States in first round play in the Ryder Cup, held this year in Scotland. The US, after a solid morning, did not win a single second-session match. Captain Paul McGinley talks about the first day:

MICHAEL GIBBONS: Paul, thanks for joining us, as always. Start us off with your thoughts on today’s matches, not the best morning but a record European performance.

PAUL McGINLEY: Yeah, terrific, great response, and as we have all seen in Ryder Cups over the years, momentum can be a huge and key factor. And we’ve seen huge momentum shifts from situations like we had in the morning, where it looked like we at one stage were going to win 3-1 in the morning and ended up losing 1 1/2 to 2 1/2. The way the Americans played the last few holes was very strong and they certainly had their tails up going into the afternoon sessions. As we’ve seen so many times in Ryder Cups, as we say that often can have a ripple effect and a domino effect and then you go on to have a great afternoon session based on that momentum you’ve achieved. For our guys to react the way they did, for all four matches to be up I think after six holes, there was blue on the board for every single match, was a terrific response. It shows a huge amount of character that we have on the team, huge amount of talent that we can come out with such strong pairings in the afternoon and a great response and resilience from the team.

MICHAEL GIBBONS: I know you’ve not had much time to ponder them, but give us your initial thoughts on tomorrow’s match-ups.

PAUL McGINLEY: Yeah, obviously I’ve gone again with guys we led off with yesterday, or today, rather, Justin and Henrik. Very strong players, as we all know, and leading off with them again. I thought Jamie and Lee played particularly strongly in the afternoon today and wanted to give them another go in the fourballs today. Lee was immense, absolutely immense, for a guy who, I think it’s his ninth Ryder Cup, and just absolutely immense to go out with that kind of a spirit and steady the ship, playing at No. 1. That’s why he was playing No. 1 this afternoon. Situations like this morning, important was not to overreact to it. Okay, wasn’t a session that went our way. But to lead out with Lee Westwood in the afternoon was huge, and Jamie was very appreciative of having him on his shoulder. Going again with Thomas and Martin. A little bit disappointed, they were today, that they only got half a match because they thought they played better than that, but again the Americans finished very strong and that can happen at this level. I’ve given Sergio a rest tomorrow morning and brought in Ian Poulter and a partnership that’s obviously worked in the past and they have practised together this week.

Q. Justin and Henrik got you two points today. Hallmarks of a classic Ryder Cup partnership?
PAUL McGINLEY: Yeah, as I said yesterday, you make decisions to the best of your ability and based on the information you have and your instinct, and some work and some don’t. Those two guys are together for a particular reason. It’s based on my understanding of who they are as people, as well as golfers. I’ve been studying them and watching them for quite a length of time and that’s what I felt. That’s why they are together. They obviously won both their matches today, and no reason not to put them out again tomorrow.

Q. Impossible to find any fault with these pairings but it must have been tempting to find a place for Victor Dubuisson. Is that true, and can you talk about that and his performance today?
PAUL McGINLEY: You’re right, it was very tempting, but I’m looking at the big picture, something I can’t reveal at the moment but you’ll see on Sunday night. I’m working to a plan. I’ll reveal a little bit more Sunday night. Victor and Graeme played particularly strong today. It was very tempting, but I was in a very privileged position that I had a lot of options.

Q. Talk about how he played, first Ryder Cup match?
PAUL McGINLEY: He was really brilliant. He was really, really brilliant and he really enjoyed it. I was there on the first tee with him, and, yeah, I’ve put a lot of work into Victor over certainly the last six months, traveled around the world with him a little bit, got to know him, and I’ve really got to know him and enjoy him and understand him. I’ve translated a lot of what I know about him to Graeme, so Graeme has really hit the ground running with him. I’ve been able to draw the two of them together during the summer period on The European Tour when they have played in events, and they have got to know each other, and I all along in my mind had them that they would be a partnership. They played very well, obviously today, and I mean, you don’t have to — you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to work out that they will more than likely play tomorrow afternoon again.

Q. At 38 years old, Jamie Donaldson has had to wait a while. How good was he today?
PAUL McGINLEY: Again, great. I mean, he was great. He loved it. I think he relished — he was very fortunate to have a guy of Lee Westwood’s calibre on his shoulder in his first Ryder Cup match and he was in a very fortunate situation to do that. I think it certainly helped him relax and play so well. No coincidence that Nicolas Colsaerts had ten birdies playing in his first Ryder Cup match with Lee Westwood at Medinah, as well, too. Lee doesn’t have to play all the golf. Just his presence makes these guys relax and play great. Having said that, that’s not disrespectful to the way Lee played today. He played absolutely fantastic.

Q. How impressive was Justin today, because he really led from the front right from the off, didn’t he?
PAUL McGINLEY: Yeah, it was a tough day today. It was a really, really tough day; cold, windy, crosswinds everywhere, fairways relatively narrow. It was tough conditions, and he’s strong. He’s very fit, he’s very strong. He’s got a very strong partner on his shoulder and his partner knows that Justin is very strong. They are a very good dynamic.

Q. Do you have any reservations now about having played Sergio and Rory together twice today, and secondly, do you have any reservations about Rory using a new driver this week?
PAUL McGINLEY: Answer both of those questions no. I think their finish today showed you what kind of a spirit they have. I think the dynamic is strong between them. And just because you go out and you lose a match in The Ryder Cup doesn’t mean you’re a bad partnership. You’re playing at the very, very elite level here in professional sport in our game of golf, and sometimes you can go out and it just doesn’t click. And it’s not because the dynamic between the two of you is wrong, but your games don’t match up, or there’s something big as to why you shouldn’t. Sometimes it just doesn’t happen. So you dust yourself off and you go back out in the afternoon. They went back out in the afternoon again and got away to a slow start again and never seemed — they seemed to be spinning their wheels a lot without really going forward. But it just shows you the resilience to have the finish that they did and pull it out of the — pull a halve match out the way they did, and I certainly wouldn’t hesitate putting them together again. I still believe there’s a great partnership. The second part of the question?

Q. Rory’s new driver —
PAUL McGINLEY: I’m not going to second guess Rory. He’s the best player in the world and he makes his own decision and I won’t have any decisions on what he makes with driver or not. That’s totally his call.

Q. Obviously wasn’t the debut Stephen Gallacher was looking for. Have you had a chance to have a word with him, and, if possible, would you like to get him out tomorrow afternoon before the singles?
PAUL McGINLEY: I would like to get him out tomorrow afternoon, yeah, and he’ll be practising tomorrow like all the guys with a view to that, with a view to playing in the afternoon. He had a disappointing obviously day today. Good birdie on the second. Slow start on the first hole, birdieing the second. It just didn’t flow. It just didn’t flow between him and Poulter today. But as I say, that can happen. That can happen, sometimes it just doesn’t happen quick. I’m fortunate that I have two senior figures on the team there that I felt would be great for the rookies in Graeme McDowell and Jamie Donaldson. I always knew that. I was struggling for a third, and Ian Poulter was chosen for a role that he didn’t really think he was going to be chosen for. But I’ve been communicating that with him during the week, and the more I talked to him about it, the more he was up for it and the more I talked to him about the big atmosphere, and the more I talked to him about Stevie and what we needed to do; but it’s a very difficult role to perform, very difficult role to perform, and I’ve given him a very different role tomorrow.

Q. What was your first thoughts when you saw that Reed and Spieth were not playing in the afternoon after their performance in the morning?
PAUL McGINLEY: To be honest, I was so involved — like I was saying all along, and I really mean this, I’m so involved in what we’re doing and how we are going about it and setting out what rotation we are putting them out, and the dynamics of that is communicating with all the vice captains and making sure we have our house in order. I know it’s a strong American Team, and when you lose, things don’t go well, like didn’t go well for America this afternoon, you only win half a point out of four, you’re going to be second guessed. If it had of been us, I would have been second guessing of my pairings, why putting two rookies out in the foursomes, which is a much tougher discipline than fourball, why put them out. But when you’re captain, you make those decisions. You make those calculated risks and I took a calculated risk, that is, although foursomes is a much tougher discipline, I had two players that were playing well, and could adapt to that discipline. And I put my focus and my experience in the morning session because that first morning in The Ryder Cup is really important to try to get a way to just get your feet running. But their American rookies performed very well in that situation, too. So Tom got his guys to really perform. His rookies performed very well in the morning.

Q. You talked on the buildup about the role of the fifth vice captain. I was wondering now that it started, if you could reflect a little bit more about that?
PAUL McGINLEY: Yeah, I mean, it’s no secret now, I can talk about it, because it’s obviously on the radar now and people see what’s happening. Des Smyth played the fifth vice captain role today and his job was to look after the four who were not on the golf course, and you could see by the results of the four who were not on the golf course, it was pretty good. He was communicating with them from 9 o’clock this morning. They were all on different agendas. A couple them played a few holes together. Des was with them and communicating and he was communicating with me and I was giving him messages that he was passing on to the players. So they were in full communication with me through Des as to what role they would be playing in the afternoon. So they knew a few hours in advance as to what number they were playing. They knew they were playing. I had a plan of playing all 12 players, and that’s what that was about.

Q. Where did they play?
PAUL McGINLEY: They were playing the golf course, two holes behind.

Q. Did your plan change at all in regards to what was going on in the morning, or was this the plan for the afternoon, was always the plan for Friday afternoon?
PAUL McGINLEY: Yeah, I think the important thing this morning, when you don’t win a session, again, it’s something I’ve learned from José Maria and learned from Monty and learned from the guys I’ve been vice captain under and guys I’ve played under, you’re not going to win every session. We’ve lost more sessions than we have won in recent times. But it’s important not to panic and it’s important, I believe, to look at the 24-hour period rather than just one session and then assess and then go again. I think you’ve got to do a mixture of both. It’s not black or it’s not white. I had an overall, as I call it, a skeleton plan, and you Bob and weave. What I saw in the morning, there was though reason to change that skeleton plan and to go with it in the afternoon. I wanted to get all 12 players out on the golf course today and we did that. Now I feel we’re in a better position to adapt and make decisions going forward.

Q. After a difficult day for Ian, was the decision to put him back with Rory in the same fourball they had Saturday at Medinah, is there any element of waiting to inspire Ian as much as inspire the crowd in that pairing?
PAUL McGINLEY: Yeah, I put him back with him because he played the senior figure today with Stevie Gallacher and obviously it didn’t go well. And Ian Poulter’s heart is that big, as we all know and that was a real body blow for him to lose a match heavily in a Ryder Cup. I just want to bring Ian Poulter back up again and put him on the shoulder of the world’s best player, and I know he’ll respond to that.

Q. McDowell after closing his match out on the 16th said that he expected he and Victor would play twice tomorrow. In terms of the big picture, in what extent are the players in on it in the sense of, how much do they know? And the second part of the question is, how much flexibility do you allow yourself in relation to the plan?
PAUL McGINLEY: There’s got to be flexibility. All plans need flexibility, and communication is 100 per cent. Before I put in any names this afternoon, I had a number of upgrade options and I looked at them and I made a decision as to what way I wanted to go and why I wanted to do it based on where I see the big picture for the week. The first fellow I spoke to was Graeme, because I knew he would have liked to play tomorrow morning and I knew Victor would, as well, too. When I sat him down and explained why he wasn’t playing in the morning and he would be playing in the afternoon, and had a real adult discussion with him, he was 100 per cent on board. I had the same with Victor, as well, too. I didn’t see him but I called him before I put the team in, as well, too, for the same reason. Yeah, I’d like to think that communication is wide and the players are all on side and they understand where I’m going with the plan and they understand there’s a moment in time when, to use your phrase in cycling, when they move to the front (smiling).

Q. Why don’t you select Victor on fourballs tomorrow morning?
PAUL McGINLEY: There’s a number of reasons. I don’t want to go into them, but there’s a number of reasons as to why he played incredibly well today, but the big reason is, I had a winning dynamic this morning with Victor. Victor had the morning off. He prepared. He played a few holes. He had a fifth vice captain looking after him and he played with a very senior player in Graeme McDowell. That dynamic, all of those dynamics before he hit his had first shot were very important psychologically for Victor to step on the first tee and I want to do that again. I think by going too much with Victor, trying to play him in the morning and trying to squeeze too much out of him, I might lose that dynamic and I really want to keep that dynamic and keep him fresh for the afternoon, because mentally he was very fresh this afternoon. Everybody plays different roles at different stages during Ryder Cups and some guys will go there and he comes back, some guy goes there and comes back. For me I have an overall what I call a skeleton plan, and it has movement in it. Because he played well today, I considered playing him in the morning, but obviously that’s not the case.

MICHAEL GIBBONS: Paul, many thanks, as always.

Ryder Cup 2014: Tom Watson Speaks About the Rough First Day for the United States

The United States Ryder Cup team took an early lead in the morning session, but gave that lead back and more in the afternoon to fall behind Europe. The US is now a +270 underdog to win the Cup. Coach Tom Watson spoke about the day after the final match conclude.

MICHAEL GIBBONS: Just start us off with your assessment of the day and we’ll go into some questions.

Watson: It started off looking pretty good, and then we didn’t perform in the afternoon, and it’s very disappointing. The players themselves are disappointed. I know the question is going to be asked about Jordan Spieth and Patrick Reed, whether I should have played them in the afternoon, and I thought at the time it was the best decision not to play them. There were a variety of reasons, but I won’t go into those. It was a decision that my vice captains and I made. That was a decision that we felt very strongly for. I can tell you one comical thing, though. When I told Patrick that he wasn’t going to play in the afternoon, it was comical at the time, not so comical now maybe but it was comical at the time. I said, “How does that make you feel?” He said, “Well, I’m all right with it.” He said, “Well, really, Captain, I’m not all right with it.” I said, “That’s the way I want you to be.” You can’t play everybody. You’re going to be second guessed, and obviously you’re going to second guess me on that decision right there. Webb Simpson and Bubba, they had a bad day. They really did. We all have bad days. And I told them, I said, that’s just one match. That’s one match out of the five, and of course we are going to be playing Bubba tomorrow in the first match, and we’re going to go with that. He’s going to play with Matt Kuchar in the first match, and so we’ll get them off to start again and see if he can play a little bit better. He’s ready to go. Phil and Keegan, they struggled this afternoon. They missed a lot of putts. Had a lot of short putts today and they kind of blew themselves out of it with not staying in it with the putts they had to make. That’s the game. There are ebbs and flows. We had an early ebb, we had a better flow in the morning and it all kind of ebbed in the afternoon. Culminated with that Watson-esque put that Rory McIlroy made at 17, hit the back of the hole, popped up and went in. Sometimes that’s the way I used to putt. I kind of lag it up there a little bit more nowadays. Can’t make those 5- or 6-footers coming back. Those are the things that I’m sure you’d like to ask me about. But I’m disappointed with the results. But I can tell you I’m not disappointed with the attitude of the team. Yes, they are disappointed, but I told them in the locker room, I said, It’s 5-3. That’s two matches. You win two matches, you’re back to even; you win four, you’re up by two. That’s the way this Ryder Cup works, and that’s the reality of it. I have to say, I’m good with it.

MICHAEL GIBBONS: I think you may have answered everything, Tom, in advance, but we’ll try and take some questions.

Question: Colin Montgomerie and Butch Harmon both questioned putting Mickelson and Bradley out in the afternoon, feeling that Phil was too tired and they wondered why Spieth and obviously Reed weren’t out. I don’t know if you’re willing to —
Watson: I answered that one.

Question: Kind of.
Watson: There are certain personal things, you look at teams — you don’t go into details and talk to the press about, bottom line. Keegan and Phil, I had to give them a shot there. They have done well in alternate-shot, and I had to give them a go.

Question: When Bubba was in here earlier, he said he thought he played well today. You seemed to question that. Can you elaborate that?
Watson: Well, he played better than Webb did today, bottom line. It takes two in fourball. It takes two in alternate-shot obviously. But in fourball, you can ham-and-egg it a little bit if one guy is not playing so well. That’s not to say Webb is not going to play well. But I’m just — Bubba is going back out and he’s one of our studs.

Question: In making pairings, how do you balance the kind of gut, artistic feel for making these pairings, versus the kind of cold, calculated, these are my best players, my highest-ranked players?
Watson: Well, you use the statistics that we have, how the players are playing on the golf course, first — not first, but part of it. But you have other gut — not gut reactions, but you have past performances, experiences that the players have had, and again, how are they playing. I’m constantly asking my vice captains out there, okay, give me an update, give me an update how they are playing. Are they making putts or are they not making putts; are they hitting the ball in the fairway; are they hitting good iron shots. That’s part of the process right now. It’s really in the now, right now, right now. We didn’t make the putts and we didn’t hit the shots in this afternoon. You know, again, we’re 5-3. 5-3 is — yeah, we’re behind, but the pairings that are made for tomorrow morning I think are strong pairings, as strong as we can put out there and we’ll see what happens.

MICHAEL GIBBONS: On that note, Captain Watson, we actually have the pairings. If I can give you a copy and maybe I can announce them while you digest them. So match one, going for Europe, Justin Rose and Henrik Stenson versus Bubba Watson and Matt Kuchar. Match two, Jamie Donaldson and Lee Westwood versus Jim Furyk and Hunter Mahan. Match three, Thomas Björn, Martin Kaymer versus Patrick Reed and Jordan Spieth. Match four, Rory McIlroy and Ian Poulter versus Jimmy Walker and Rickie Fowler. Your initial thoughts on those?

Watson: Well, my initial thoughts is I like what I see. I really like what I see.

MICHAEL GIBBONS: That’s as good a thought as any.

Question: Going back to today’s matches, you described Patrick’s reaction to your decision. Jordan, when he was in here, said he was 100 per cent certain he would play because you had said that the people, the two teams that played well in the morning, would play in the afternoon. Can you clear up the confusion that he clearly was feeling about what you said and what you did?
Watson: Well, I take the blame for that. I assessed that even though they won in the morning, that there maybe was a better team the fourball in the afternoon. Again, I go back to the point where I say it from the beginning, I’m trying to make the best decisions at that time that I possibly can with the best information I have. And again, it’s a collective decision, but the final decision is with me. And that decision not to play them was a hard decision to make. I had some — I had some doubt in making that decision, but my gut feeling said that was the right decision to make. You’re never fully, fully certain when you make the decisions, because you just don’t know how the outcome is going to be. You can’t predict it. But with the information I had at hand, I felt that that was the best decision.

Question: I hope this doesn’t sound like an unfair question, because you can’t hit the shots for the players, but now looking back on Day 1, do you feel, to use a term from a different sport, that you’ve been out-coached?
Watson: We were out-played, I know that. Again, you’ve got 12 players to play and you’re trying to put the best teams together. They got it done this afternoon. I have to give them credit.

Question: Looking ahead to tomorrow, if Saturday at a regular event is considered, quote-unquote, moving day, how do you classify Saturday at The Ryder Cup?
Watson: (Chuckles). Well, again, match three, match four, and we are two points behind. And as I told the players: Those are two matches you’ve got to win more than the other guys to get even. I told them, I said, “I want more than even.” And they are buying into that. They still have — even though they are disappointed, there was the attitude, all right, let’s go get this thing done.

Question: From a motivational standpoint, how does the captain get the flow going?
Watson: Well, I’m going to find out. I’m going to go up to the team room right now where they are all probably sitting down having a quick dinner. They are going to go have an early night. I’ll sit there and speak with them. I’ll take — I’ll take my vice captains with me, but I’ll make a point, the same point I made in the locker room. This is the second quarter of a football game. You’re down, and there’s no bad attitudes here. We’re out there to do a job. You’re going to go out there tomorrow and do that job. You didn’t get it done today, but the game is still on. It’s not a sprint. It’s a marathon. Yeah, we’re behind right now. We were up in the morning, but now we’re behind. To me, this is — you know, the ebbs and flows right now; we’re in an ebb. And frankly, that’s where we are.

Question: You kind of answered what I was about to ask, but just after the strong morning performance and then what happened this afternoon, do you expect the players to be a little down, a little dejected? Do you anticipate having to do quite a bit of coaching? Are these, as professionals, guys that can pull themselves out of this slump and go back 100 per cent tomorrow?
Watson: Sure, they are disappointed they didn’t get it done, but they’ve been disappointed before. I keep — these guys are all great players. They can get it done. And again, I believe in them, and they believe in themselves. This is just the second quarter of the ball game.

Question: Going into this afternoon before the morning was over and you had to turn in your pairings, had they changed in your mind, the afternoon pairings, or what you had decided on during the morning?
Watson: Well, they probably changed — probably changed, obviously with Bubba, the afternoon pairings. Thought I would probably play Bubba twice, but it didn’t work out that way. We had some teams we wanted to play in the afternoon in the foursomes we thought are strong teams and they are strong teams.

Question: Can you tell me who you replaced Bubba with?
Watson: Well, no — I mean, it’s just — you know, from the beginning, you had some horses that you looked at, you were going to ride. When they don’t perform, you have to make a decision not to play them, and that’s what I did.

Question: Is that the case here with Mickelson and Bradley?
Watson: Yes, it is, sure. It’s really just common sense I think. They played 36 holes. They are tired. Give them a break in the morning, get their legs back, and there’s a good chance they’ll go in the afternoon in some way, shape or form. They may not go together, but they will go in the afternoon.

Question: Jordan this morning, after his round, said that he and Patrick Reed kind of talked to you — made a case that they should be paired and kind of talked you into that, into pairing them. Had you thought of them before, and was that really true, that they really convinced you to put them out together?
Watson: Well, I don’t think there’s — I don’t remember that conversation to be honest. They were — it really was something we thought about early in this decision, putting teams together. As I said, putting the teams together evolved during — we had certain teams we wanted to think about playing before we got here, but after that, it was watching these players play, how they interacted, what we thought was the best pairings, and it looked more and more that these two guys could really get along and do the job. They certainly did this morning.

Question: Is your plan right now to play all 12 tomorrow?
Watson: I don’t know yet. Don’t know yet. Just depends on how they play tomorrow morning. Just like what I did today. There were some things that happened during the course of the match with players may start to struggle a little bit, and you never know. You never know. So I can’t say that.

MICHAEL GIBBONS: I think we’re all done. Captain Watson, many thanks, as always.

SBR Takes a Look at Nitrogen Sportsbook

Nitrogen Sportsbook continues to make some noise in the bitcoin sportsbook market. Sportsbook Review recently looked into Nitrogen and gave its stamp of approval. Key points from the SBR’s story:

1) Nitrogen opened in late 2012 as a typical sportsbook. They added a bitcoin deposit option in March 2013, then moved exclusively to bitcoins after launching in November 2013.

2) Nitrogen’s headquarters are located in San Pedro, Costa Rica, with their marketing offices located in Canada. Their software was designed in-house.

3) There are no future plans to add fiat currencies as deposit/withdrawal options. Other digital currencies are being looked at, however.

4) Withdrawals are near-immediate, taking on average 30 seconds to process. In most cases, the withdrawals are automated. There are no limits to a payout request; Nitrogen says they routinely process transactions worth $25,000.

5) Nitrogen does not require user names, allowing anonymity to its customers. Hand in hand with this anonymity is a lack of deposit bonuses; bonus whores have no need to open multiple accounts using multiple names because bonuses are non-existent.

6) Nitrogen offers a wide range of sports betting: over 50 international soccer markets, tennis, cricket, rugby, combat sports, volleyball, and all American sports markets including props.

7) SBR has Nitrogen rated as a B, a relatively high grade for a book under two years old. “Nitrogen’s entire model rests on its ability to move bitcoins. If it can hold player confidence with immediate transactions its business is likely to grow. A slow-pay within this model will have an instant impact and all SBR and fellow players the ability to draw conclusions rather quickly.”

Bitcoins are the future when it comes to internet gambling. While fly by night companies may see bitcoins as a great way to get untraceable funds, sportsbooks like Nitrogen are using the quick payouts as a tool to build their reputation. A sportsbook is only as good as their last payout, and 30 second payouts, unheard of prior to bitcoins, put Nitrogen in the elite circle of bitcoin sportsbooks.

ESPN’s Thursday Night Football: Favored Cowboys Host Texas Tech

The Oklahoma St. Cowboys will open their Big 12 Conference schedule at home with a Thursday night game against Texas Tech. The Cowboys have blistered Texas Tech in recent years, averaging 59 points a game over the last three meetings. They have beaten Tech five straight times, including last year’s 52-34 win at Texas Tech.

Texas Tech will head into the game missing their defensive coordinator. Todd Wallerstedt was suspected of being under the influence of a unknown substance when he reported to work last Monday. He resigned days later. Linebacker coach Mike Smith takes over the defense.

“He’s been making a few changes, just by the way we line up,” linebacker Sam Eguavoen said. “We’ll play faster. There’s a little less in the game plan now, so we’re going to be looking less to the sideline to know what we do next. It’s going to be more on-the-fly stuff. I like that better. It’s less thinking. You have a base plan in your head and you can just read and react to the offense.”

Although Smith will become the seventh coordinator to call Tech’s defensive signals since the start of the 2007 season, Eguavoen said this transition does not feel as drastic as some others because the Red Raiders will continue with their 3-4 alignment and terminologies.

“This is just a minor change, really,” said Eguavoen, a senior. “I feel like we’re more hungry. I trust coach Smith. I trust my teammates. We’re going to get it done this week.”

Texas Tech is 2-1 straight up and 0-3-0 against the line so far this year. They are averaging 33.3 points per game, and giving up 36.7 points per game on the defensive side of the ball. On offense, Texas Tech is averaging 170.3 rushing yards per game on 29 attempts, 5.9 yards per carry average. They are throwing the ball 43 times per game for a total of 327 yards, averaging 7 yards per passing attempt. Overall, Texas Tech has gained 498 total yards per game on an average of 72 plays.

On defense, Texas Tech is allowing 433 yards per game on 84 plays for a 5 yards per play average. They have given up 12 yards per point so far this year. Texas Tech’s opponents have run the ball 69% of the time, and are averaging 5 yards per rushing attempt. The team has allowed completions on 50% of its opponents’ passing attempts, good for 135 passing yards per game (5 yards per passing attempt).

Oklahoma St is averaging 38 points per game so far in 2014, while allowing 24 points a game to its opponents. They have a 2-1-0 record against the spread, with a 2-1 straight up record.

Defensively, Oklahoma St’s opponents are averaging 111.3 rushing yards per game on 36 attempts, a 3.1 yards per carry average. They are throwing the ball 31 times per game for a total of 241 yards, averaging 5 yards per passing attempt. Overall, Oklahoma St’s opponents have gained 352 total yards per game on an average of 67 plays.

On offense, Oklahoma St is averaging 440 yards per game on 73 plays, for a 6 yards per play average. They are averaging 12 yards per point so far this year. Oklahoma St runs the ball 58% of the time, and are averaging 4.2 yards per rushing attempt. The team has completed 55.9% of its passing attempts, good for 264 passing yards per game (8.5 yards per passing attempt).